Comparing M&A Structures
- Topics:
- Deal Structure
- Source:
- Ross Crossland Weston Mirus
FREE Registration is required
Overview: By most reports, merger and acquisition (M&A) activity is picking up again in the U.S. However, whether M&A activity is slow or fast-paced, the choice of deal structure is always of critical concern to the relevant constituencies - - buyer, seller, shareholders, and lenders. But, a question which arises is that should the deal be an asset sale, a stock sale, or a merger? The choice of deal structure usually affects buyer and seller differently, so deal structure negotiations are best handled at the earliest stages. In the ?typical? middle-market M&A deal, there are three main factors driving the choice of deal structure: (1) allocation of liabilities, (2) consents, and (3) tax considerations. All these three have been discussed in detail. To know more, refer to the article.
(Is this item miscategorized? Does it need more tags? Let us know.)
Format: HTML | Date: Nov 2003 | Pages: 1
People who downloaded this item also downloaded
![]() |
Investment Agreements |
![]() |
Selling Your Business Deal Structure And Taxes |
![]() |
How To Structure Your Deal |
![]() |
Selling Your Business-Deal Structure And Taxes |
![]() |
Due Diligence Checklist |




