Project Cost Risk Analysis Using Crystal Ball-1

Topics:
Modeling,
Project Management
Tags:
Crystal Ball,
Security,
Risk Analysis,
Risk,
Overruns,
Management,
Future Estimate,
Estimate,
Data Collection,
Strategy
Source:
Crystal Ball

FREE Registration is required

Overview: The typical project often overruns its cost estimate. Overruns are common on government and commercial projects, even when changes in the design are taken into account. One reason this happens is because cost estimating traditionally fails to take into account the risk that the work will actually cost more (or less) than provided by even the most competent estimate. Future estimates are not facts but statements of probability about how things will turn out. Because estimates are probabilistic assessments, costs may actually be higher or lower than estimated even by seasoned professional estimators. The reasons are often causes that are outside the control of the project manager, but may also be endemic to the estimating process, the project strategy or the corporate culture within the project contractor. A cost risk estimating method is available that provides more accurate estimates of total project cost. The method is based on Monte Carlo simulation. It helps gain better information than traditional methods because it recognizes that project costs are uncertain. Traditional cost estimating methods that rely on summing up project elements’ cost estimates will not result in even the most likely total project cost. Traditional methods cannot answer the important questions of: (1) how likely are we to overrun? (2) What is our exposure? and (3) Where is the risk in the project? A Monte Carlo simulation can provide answers to these questions. Data collection is crucial to a powerful risk analysis. Data must be collected on low, most likely and high possible costs and on correlation between elements. Crystal Ball provides the computing power for the Monte Carlo simulations. The purpose of a cost risk analysis is to assist the project manager by indicating the magnitude of the problem and where risk management efforts should be focused. This paper has indicated how this is accomplished using a simplified construction cost case study.

(Is this item miscategorized? Does it need more tags? Let us know.)

Format: HTML | Date: Jan 2003 | Pages: 1


advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here

Returning users: Log In Here!

Already registered on BNET, TechRepublic, or ZDNet? Simply log in.

Free Membership: Sign Up Now!

Sign up for a free membership today and get instant and unlimited access to one of the largest databases of white papers, webcasts, and casestudies anywhere. Your FREE membership allows you to:

  • Download an unlimited amount of content, including classic and current white papers, case studies, webcasts and more
  • Track content on your chosen topics of interest
  • Receive targeted email alerts when your favorite content is added
  • Save content for future reading
  • Receive our member newsletter

When you register to access this directory, you become a member of BNET. In addition, you allow us to share your information with companies that produce products or services featured in the library--so that such companies may contact you with information and offers regarding their products and services. This enables us to keep the library a free service. As a directory registrant, you will receive a complimentary subscription to the BNET member newsletter, The BNET Report. You can unsubscribe from this newsletter at any time. By clicking the Sign up button, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understand our Privacy Policy (updated).