Evaluating Government Regulations
- Topics:
- Regulations
- Source:
- Australian National University
FREE Registration is required
Overview: Governments commonly acknowledge the need to improve the quality of government regulation, or to reduce undue regulatory burdens. This raises the question of what criteria should be used to evaluate the quality of a regulation. Economists and lawyers - constitutional lawyers or legal draughtsmen - tend to use different, but arguably largely complementary, criteria to evaluate regulations. In New Zealand, at least, the two approaches have been evolving independently. This paper focuses on the New Zealand situation.
(Is this item miscategorized? Does it need more tags? Let us know.)
Format: PDF | Size: 148KB | Date: Nov 2003 | Pages: 15
People who downloaded this item also downloaded
 |
Why Differences In The Extent Of Regulation Across Countries Exist? |
