Evidence-Based Practice as Mental Health Policy: Three Controversies and a Caveat
- Topics:
- Healthcare Services
- Tags:
- Benefits,
- Software,
- Project HOPE,
- Human Resources,
- Healthcare,
- Health Care,
- Evidence Based Practice,
- Enterprise Software,
- Controversy,
- Vertical Industries
- Source:
- Project HOPE
FREE Registration is required
Overview: Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is the subject of vigorous controversy in the field of mental health. This paper discusses three distinct but interrelated controversies: how inclusive the mental health evidence base should be; whether mental health practice is a variety of applied science; and when and how the effectiveness goal in mental health is defined. This article provides examples of evidence-based policy in mental health. These controversies pertain as well to general medicine. To the extent that they remain unresolved, evidence-based policy making may lead to ineffective and limited care.
(Is this item miscategorized? Does it need more tags? Let us know.)
Format: PDF | Size: 109KB | Date: Feb 2005 | Pages: 11




